Context Engineering Platforms: Knol vs Competitors

Strategic comparison for engineering teams building agentic systems with memory. Based on official documentation and confirmed capabilities. Updated February 2026.

Mem0: vector-first memory with optional graph augmentationZep: temporal knowledge graph memory engineKnol: context engineering platform (semantic + keyword + graph + write-time optimization)Letta: agent-first framework with integrated memory ($10M seed)

Core Capabilities (Yes/No)

CapabilityMem0ZepKnolLetta
Vector semantic retrieval
Graph retrieval support
Keyword / BM25 retrieval
Write-time embeddings (not query)
Temporal fact validity model
Per-write fact extraction
Hybrid search fusion (semantic + keyword + graph)
Direct graph entity/edge APIs
Working memory layer
Procedural memory layer
PostgreSQL-native storage
LLM cost optimization (embeddings)
Conflict detection & merging
Webhook integrations
Tenant isolation (RLS)
Built-in PII extraction guardrails
Agent-first architecture

Legend: ✓ available as core capability, ✗ not a primary feature or requires integration layer.

DimensionMem0ZepKnolLetta
Primary design goalCompress and retrieve salient user facts efficientlyModel evolving relationships through a temporal knowledge graphContext engineering: full-stack semantic + keyword + graph retrieval with write-time optimizationAgent control plane with built-in memory and LLM management
ArchitectureVector-first; graph is additiveKnowledge graph-native; temporal metadata on edgesPostgreSQL foundation; semantic indexing + BM25 + graph + procedural layersFramework-centric; wraps external memory backends
Memory modelFact extraction into vectors; graph optional overlayFacts on edges with validity windows; historical snapshotsMemories + episodes + entities/edges + working memory + procedural memorySession context and turn-level working memory
Temporal semanticsLimited; vector-centric defaultsNative timestamps, validity windows, lifecycle-aware updatesBi-temporal fields, validity-based archival, conflict detection on updatesTurn-based session history
Retrieval strategySemantic first; graph relations augment when enabledGraph traversal and context rollup over user/session pathsIntent-aware hybrid: semantic vectors + keyword ranking + graph paths + learned fusionIn-context retrieval with LLM-guided reasoning
Cost optimizationStandard embedding call per queryQuery-time graph traversalWrite-time embeddings (75% LLM cost reduction); static vectors at retrievalLLM call per agent turn
Data substrateSaaS or managed (Mem0 Cloud)SaaS or self-host (with operational complexity)PostgreSQL (self-host or managed); single source of truthLLM service + optional memory backend
Engineering fitTeams wanting vector memory with minimal modeling overheadTeams needing rich temporal and relational reasoningTeams building production agents with memory, demanding cost control and explainabilityTeams building multi-turn agents with integrated memory and LLM orchestration
Launch readinessProduction (SaaS)Production (self-host requires ops knowledge)Launch-ready with write-time embeddings, conflict detection, and webhooks fully wiredProduction framework (memory integration varies by backend)

Practical Notes for Knol

  • Knol already exposes graph entities/edges and async graph-building through NATS write events.
  • Hybrid retrieval is implemented in service-retrieve with intent-aware weighting and RRF.
  • Keyword retrieval uses PostgreSQL text search (plainto_tsquery + ts_rank_cd).
  • Tenant isolation is implemented with RLS context helpers and tenant-scoped policies.

Knol OSS vs Paid Boundary

OSS (self-host)

Core memory engine, APIs, SDKs, and retrieval primitives stay open source.

Cloud / Enterprise (paid)

Managed reliability, compliance, enterprise identity/governance, and support SLAs.

Sources used for external product behavior: Mem0 docs (memory operations, graph memory, vector-vs-graph guidance) and Zep docs (facts, temporal timestamps, memory.get/graph.search, graph APIs). Verified on February 17, 2026.